Another set of tools that are worth using

The data in the analysis comes from the Google LightHouse tool and the crux report (Chrome User Experience Report). Source: /performance-scoring/ 1 The first element is the ” First Contentful Paint” (FCP), which analyzes how long it took the browser to display the first element of the page code (DOM) after, for example, clicking on a link leading to the indicated page. 2 The second element is the “Speed ​​index”, which is designed to examine the page loading speed. 3 The third element is the Largest Contentful Paint (LCP). It is responsible for checking the time needed to display the largest element contained in the page code.

Often as I mentioned earlier

There are sliders or banners with graphics that have not been properly compressed. 4 The fourth element “delay from the first interaction” (TTI – Time to Interactive). This metric is responsible for analyzing the time needed to achieve interactivity of a website. 5 The fifth element is the ” Total Blocking Time” (TBT). It examines the Malawi Email List blocking time of page elements from the first moment of rendering to the time of reaching interactivity (TTI). 6 The sixth element is the so-called ” Cumulative Layout Shift ” (CLS ). CLS can be observed when, while browsing a website, we want to click on its element, e.

In the form of a banner or button

Email List

It changes its position, preventing us from going to the target subpage. Considering the introduction of the CWV, one should also remember about its components that are involved in the calculation of the score. Such as the aforementioned LCP, CLS, or FID ( First Inpud Delay) , which analyzes how much time must elapse from going to a subpage Bab Directory until the user can click on the elements. Often, FIDs can be seen when we wait for a slider to load on a. Page to be able to see what is on it, and then go to another subpage if it is linked.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *